Tags
% of AUM, Andreas Rialas, ARGO, Argo Group, asset managers, catalyst, distressed assets, intrinsic value, Kyriakos Rialas, Price/Cash, share buyback, shareholder activism, tender offer, The Argo Fund
Argo Group Ltd. (ARGO:LN) has been a consistent Top 7 holding for me since launching the blog last year. It currently represents 4.9% of my portfolio.
It was among the first handful of stocks I wrote up late last year (here & here). I also included it in my Baker’s Dozen for 2012. I followed up with another detailed write-up in May-12. [btw An asset manager series later that month may add useful context: Parts I, II, III, culminating in a Fortress Investment Group (FIG:US) write-up]. I then briefly revisited Argo in Oct-12 as part of my catalyst series.
I was pleased to note recently my Argo write-ups have actually proved the most popular with readers. Which certainly isn’t reflected in the performance of the share price: ARGO is actually down 20% YTD! Considering the UK market’s progress this year, and based on reader/investor feedback, it’s reasonable to suggest some/all of this price decline might have been avoided…
This compelled me to write to Argo’s management a month ago with a number of recommendations to enhance shareholder value, improve investor relations & disclosure, and to increase Assets under Management. I’m pleased to see the letter would appear to have reminded new/existing investors of Argo’s far higher intrinsic value, and its potential – the share price has subsequently rallied +15%. It also garnered some v useful shareholder feedback & support, which prompted me to send this follow-up letter to Argo last week:
‘December 12, 2012
FAO: Kyriakos Rialas, CEO
Andreas Rialas, CIO
Cc: Michael Kloter, Chairman
33-37 Athol Street
Douglas
Isle of Man
IM1 1LB
Dear Kyriakos & Andreas,
I’ve opted to address this letter to you both, as directors & the largest shareholders of Argo. Again, thanks to Kyriakos for his previous reply – I’m pleased to hear my ‘observations…will [be] take[n] into account’. Please note I am writing this letter on behalf of myself, Guy Thomas, and & a number of other shareholders. We currently represent an aggregate 5% shareholding in Argo.
I look forward to your careful consideration of my other recommendations. However, based on feedback to date, there is a widespread & more urgent focus among shareholders on a return of capital – ideally, via my Share Buyback/Tender recommendation. The recent 15% rally in the share price (since my letter) is welcome, but doesn’t mitigate the fact ARGO is still down 20% YTD. It also doesn’t address shareholders’ increasing frustration with the company’s substantial undervaluation.
The current 11.625p share price is a 44% discount to 20.7p of net cash/investments per share, and a massive 63% discount to my latest 31.1p estimate of intrinsic value per share. Argo’s $22.5 million of net cash/investments represents a compelling opportunity to:
– Commit to a minimum return of $12.5 mio to shareholders (approx. equal to Argo’s current market capitalization), within a reasonable time-scale.
– Initiate a tender offer to retire (at least) 1/3 of Argo’s outstanding shares, priced at 17.6p (a 15% discount to current net cash/investments per share). This would cost just $6.4 mio, about half the total commitment. It would also enhance net cash/investments per (remaining) share to 22.2p, and my estimated intrinsic value to 37.8p per share.
– Determine the most efficient return of the balance of the commitment to shareholders – via regular share buybacks, a return of capital, or perhaps a special dividend. Obviously, share buybacks at a continued discount to NAV/intrinsic value would further enhance those values.
– Ensure adequate liquidity (of $10.0 mio) for the continued success of Argo’s business operations & seeding of its funds.
– Allow shareholders to realize the company’s current market capitalization, while continuing to participate in Argo’s long term success.
Considering the current $302 mio in Assets under Management, this new level of liquidity would remain on a comparable basis to many other listed managers. In my experience, buying & selling funds, the importance of seeding in fund-raising is sometimes over-stated. There are alternatives that might also be employed to reduce/replace the need for seeding. Of course, such an exercise in value realization & enhancement for Argo’s shareholders would also be a terrific selling point with clients.
I have over two decades of experience in investing, trading & sales, asset management, and corporate treasury. Guy’s breadth of experience clearly speaks for itself. I believe we can offer a valuable contribution, both from a business & a shareholder perspective. We look forward to your active engagement regarding this proposal. We are both available by email (wexboymail@yahoo.com) and by phone to discuss further, at your convenience.
I would appreciate your reply to confirm receipt of this letter & when you expect to respond properly. Please note I intend to publish this letter on the Wexboy blog in due course.
Kind regards,
Wexboy
Readers:
If you’re a private investor/adviser/fund manager with an (in)direct shareholding in ARGO (large or small), and are in broad agreement with this proposal (and/or my prior recommendations), I’d like to hear from you.
Please comment below and/or email me at wexboymail@yahoo.com
Thank you!
Pingback: Hitting The Century (XI – Distressed) | Wexboy
Pingback: Argo Group – Awaiting Results | Wexboy
Pingback: Catalysts – A Summary (Part II of II) | Wexboy
I asked that question over at oddballstocks but didnt get an answer. Hope to have better luck here.
In the H1 report they describe the merger of two smaller funds into the new Argo Special Situations Fund. Additionally, they write that the high-water mark for the new fund was reset to zero.
Do I get it right that this means that as soons as they deliver a positive performance the 20% performance fee will become active?
Besides that, the fund is an closed-end vehicle with a three year duration (extendable upon request). This means that Argo risks loosing USD 107m or 1/3 of AuM in 2015, right?
Rodja,
It appears that way – here’s the relevant sentence: ‘As part of this restructuring exercise the high-water mark for earning performance fees was reset to zero.’ Rightly or wrongly, I don’t tend to focus much on fixed life fund maturities. Obviously, if clients want to redeem from any fund(s), they’ll do it sooner or later. Fixed life funds don’t necessarily pose a greater challenge in this regard than open funds, over time – in fact, an upcoming fund ‘maturity’ can be a marvelous excuse for a new fund launch & a full-on fund-raising drive.
In Argo’s case, I address the slippage in AUM in the past couple of years by: i) haircutting my valuation of the asset management business to 3.75% of AUM (if AUM were increasing steadily & incentive fees being earned, a valuation of 7.5% or even 10% of AUM wdn’t be unreasonable, considering Argo’s fee structure, and ii) calling for more resources to be devoted to fund-raising, and other alternative revenue/fee sources (for example, like white-label & sub-advisory contracts) to be explored – see here: https://wexboy.wordpress.com/2012/11/16/argo-escape-from-an-evil-state/
Cheers,
Wexboy
Pingback: Heading Into 2013… « Wexboy
http://www.oddballstocks.com/2012/12/argo-undervalued-asset-manager-with.html
http://canteatvalueinvesting.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/share-buybacks-thought-experiment.html
Pingback: A follow-up letter to Argo | Alpha Vulture