Portfolio Allocation (XV – Emerging & Frontier Markets)

Tags

asset managers, BRICS, closed-end funds, developed markets, dollar-cost averaging, emerging markets, frontier markets, Hong Kong, Howard Marks, NAV discount, NAV premium, portfolio allocation, reductio ad absurdum, Trading Economics

Continued from here. [And most definitely, this is the last post in the series!]

This might actually be the perfect time to write about emerging markets – the developed market douche-bags (DMDs) are out in force again, warning us emerging markets are tanking… It’s a common refrain: a) developed markets are in recession, emerging markets must tank, b) developed markets are showing zero growth, emerging markets must tank, c) developed market growth’s bouncing back & rates are rising, emerging markets must tank, and d) well…emerging markets simply must tank!

2013 may turn out to be even sillier. So far, most of the year’s been spent denigrating – nay, reviling – emerging markets, simply because developed stock markets have done so well. Of course, the sub-text here is ‘why don’t you just forget/sell emerging markets (forever) & just stick to developed markets?!‘ Christ on a rope, that’s like handing out bloody gold medals to whoever took the most steroids… And now developed markets have caught a dose of the colly-wobbles in the past week or two – again, DMDs would have you believe it’s another good reason to sell emerging markets. Yes folks, we’ve finally reached the point of reductio ad absurdum:

i) Developed markets go up – sell emerging markets,

ii) Developed markets go down – sell emerging markets, and

iii) Don’t forget i) & ii).

Advertisement

Livermore Investments (I)

Tags

activist investors, Baker's Dozen, CLOs, closed-end funds, delisting risk, Everest Capital, intrinsic value, investment companies, Leverage, Livermore Investments, NAV discount, Net LTV, Owner-Operator, principal-agent problem, private equity funds, real estate, safe-havens, share buyback, TER

Livermore Investments Group Ltd. (LIV:LN) is one of my 2012 Baker’s Dozen stock picks. And doing v nicely too…up +79% YTD! This post isn’t just specifically about Livermore – LIV also offers great perspective on owner-operators, share buybacks & shareholder value. Oh, and – shhh, draw the blinds – I’ll whisper it: De-listings...

LIV is a London-listed (closed-end) investment company. Its portfolio is focused on 3 different investment areas:

i) Real Estate:   The major holding is $38.2 mio (net of related debt) invested in Wyler Park, a commercial/residential Swiss property. It’s fully let, on a gross 5.1% rental yield, with development potential for another 37% of floor space. The other significant investment is $14.7 mio of convertible debt in SRS Charminar, an Indian real estate company. Unfortunately, the stake’s been subject to long-running litigation. But with ample initial over-collateralization, and an agreed settlement this year, continuing uncertainty’s now hopefully related to timing & expenses, rather than recovery value. Net of interest rate swaps, total net property investment is $45.9 mio, or about 32% of NAV.

Hitting The Century: It’s Pretty Panties Time..! (II)

Tags

absolute return, alternative assets, closed-end funds, currency allocation, distressed assets, emerging markets, frontier markets, FX rates, home bias investing, NAV discount, portfolio allocation, quantitative easing, real assets, special situations, value investing

Continued from here – we examined the true underlying currency allocation in my portfolio (incorporating other financial/investment assets & liabilities). I encourage you to perform a similar exercise (on an ongoing basis). Some will discover unexpected allocations, but more will discover how concentrated they are in a single currency! Of course, I’ve written about home bias before, but that was in relation to equities: I beg your indulgence as I take another brief look from a currency perspective.

If you suffer from single currency concentration (ouch…I think about the EUR/Eurozone so much it bloody hurts! ;-)), presumably it’s in your home currency? Think about the fact your job, your house, (much of) your wealth, the level of your taxes, even your (assumed) social order is already inextricably linked to that currency & country. How much do you want to keep adding to that bet? But the majority of readers live in developed markets, and may ask: ‘How seriously could my home currency decline?‘. Well, say you live in Japan: The USD/JPY‘s 80.53 right now – how outlandish is it to picture it at 120+, or even 150+, in 5-7 years?!

From Russia With Love (Part II)

Tags

Aurora Russia, Baring Emerging Europe, closed-end funds, emerging markets, frontier markets, infrastructure, JPMorgan Russian Securities, Mongolia, Origo Partners, Prosperity Voskhod Fund, QE, Renaissance Russia Infrastructure Equities, Russia, Templeton Russia & East European Fund, Vietnam Infrastructure, Vietnam Opportunity Fund

Continued from here:     So why the interest in Russia? Well, for me, pretty much any emerging/frontier market’s preferable to those in the developed world these days! Everywhere I look, I see better growth, better demographics, better government finances, lower debt and no currency debasement… And all this for stock market valuations that are similar to/cheaper than Western markets. There are a number of markets I feel are particularly attractive – for example, I’ve highlighted Vinacapital Vietnam Opportunity Fund (VOF:LN) before as a good stock pick for exposure to Vietnam. With my continuing bullish view on oil and other commodities (and the inflation risks posed by global QE), Russia presents a compelling market opportunity.

So how does Russia actually stack up these days? Well, first one needs to realize how far it’s come. In the past 10 years GDP has more than quintupled, Russia’s now a Top 10 global economy, and average GDP per capita (in nominal terms) is around $16,700. This last stat’s v interesting – $17 K goes pretty far in what’s still an emerging market, and it explains the booming Russian middle class, something many investors have under-estimated.