Asset Managers – Cash Hogs & What’s Hot, What’s Not

Tags

% of AUM, 3i Group, Affiliated Managers, AHL, alternative assets, Altira, Argo Group, Artio Global, Ashmore Group, asset managers, carry trade, Charlemagne Capital, CIFC, Cowen Group, David Harding, FRM Holdings, GLG Partners, IFMI, Integrated Asset Management, Janus Capital, Man Group, MPC Capital, Polar Capital, Price/Cash, Ramius, Record plc, Volcker rule, Winton Capital

Continued from here. And plse ref. my (alternative) asset manager table here. Taking a look, I marvel again how conservative most managers are in terms of net cash/investments. Less than 1 in 10 has net debt, while the average manager’s on a 4.6 Price/Cash multiple – 22% of the average market cap. consists of net cash/investments! This has always puzzled me. In general, particularly now, I don’t believe shareholders are being properly rewarded for this asset/financial strength. You’d think managers would be a little savvier about shareholder value..?! And reasons for this surplus cash? I can think of three:

i) Management Nap Policy:  Ah diddums, management finds it hard to sleep, or even nap, unless they’ve a large chunk of cash lying ’round so they feel warm & cozy… Maybe they’re even hoping a lap dancer will be impressed at the size of their…balance sheet? A touch sarcastic? Don’t forget a company’s really just a collection of people – which can sometimes be wonderful…or terrible! [btw Here’s another collection of people]

Asset Managers – A First Look at the Alternatives

Tags

% of AUM, 3i Group, alternative assets, Apollo Global, Argo Group, Blackstone, Carlyle Group, Cowen, developed markets, distressed assets, emerging markets, Fortress, Janus Capital, KKR, Mr. Market, Oaktree Capital, Och-Ziff, Record plc, special situations, Tetragon Financial

We’ve just witnessed the rather limp launches of Oaktree Capital & Carlyle Group (reflecting the current malaise in asset manager valuations), so it’s a good time to look more closely at the asset manager universe. But where to start? Well, the boring end of the spectrum, I guess:

Traditional managers are dime a dozen, with little to distinguish them. Most focus on developed markets (reflecting a rather timid clientele), and demonstrate no particular ability to outperform the market over time. They now face relentless competition from an ever-expanding ETF universe which, on average, easily matches them on performance and wallops them on fees.