Hitting The Century (XII – The Distressed Consumer)

Tags

ATMs, consumer receivables, correlation, credit checks, debt agreements, discount stores, distressed assets, distressed consumers, distressed investing, European sovereign debt crisis, gold, healthcare, home shopping, life settlements, litigation, marijuana, Mosney, pawn shops, payday loans, pre-paid cards, scratch cards, student loans, sub-prime, trailers, unsecured loans, vice stocks

Continued from here (& here). In this post, we’ll turn our attention to the distressed consumer.

You may just consider this exploitation of the great unwashed – but in reality, they’re often the most expensive customers (pro rata) to acquire & service. (Illegal) immigrants also fall into this category – a fairly unavoidable cost of freight they pay in light of their status. [As US-listed Hispanic plays become increasingly touted & expensive, distressed consumer businesses are a cheap back door play on a sub-set of that population]. Also, the amounts involved with these customers is (inevitably) small. Actually, businesses are really targeting a much bigger & more lucrative opportunity – the democratic exploitation of an enduring human frailty:

Financial stupidity…

The obvious place to start here is with the usual vices – drinking, smoking, gambling, luxury goods… 😉 But these sectors are huge & everybody’s doing ’em – I’m going to skip anything so mainstream (but I’m fascinated how highly rated they are!). I probably should consider drugs too, with marijuana access now increasingly legal & convenient across the US – but the real stupidity here might actually be investing in marijuana stocks!?

While I’m at it, we could make a case for including healthcare – people who make poor financial decisions surely make even worse decisions about their long-term health? [Especially with the communist approach to healthcare in the US & most other developed nations: All good deeds go unrewarded, and the worst 20% consume 80% of the resources… Which simply encourages everybody to race to the bottom (of the ice-cream tub). Look, I’m all for providing a safety net, but not when it’s stuffed with cheese burgers!] Let’s skip healthcare as a whole other mess… In similar vein, a trillion dollars of US student debt could have mutated into the biggest distressed consumer play around – since everybody seems to have now decided they can’t/won’t pay any longer – but that’s underwritten by a suckered population also.

Right, let’s move on – picture you’re an average distressed consumer:

Advertisement

Catalysts – A Summary (Part II of II)

Tags

activist investors, Argo Group, Avangardco, binary outcomes, Carl Icahn, catalyst, Daniel Loeb, Expected Value, government regulation, Herbalife, IRR, junk bonds, litigation, major sale, NAV discount, Risk Arbitrage, Robert Chapman, share buyback, shareholder activism

Continued from here.

iv) Activist Investors are my next catalyst. Obviously, there’s no specific timetable here, but since most activists are performance-driven hedge funds, a 6 mth to 2 yr timeline is reasonable. Activists in the UK usually target asset discounts & realizations (so investment trusts/companies are ideal), while European/US activists are perhaps more biased towards operational change (which may require a longer investment horizon).

Most activists prefer to agitate for change behind the scenes, but some prefer to be more public: Carl Icahn (I read King Icahn at least once a year) is the king of the activists – he’s 77 now, but is more of top of his game today than he was 30 yrs ago! Other notorious activists (& 13D filers) are Dan Loeb of Third Point (and here, though he claims he’s mellowed now!) & Robert Chapman, who (presumably!?) introduced the first ‘fuck‘ in an SEC filing. More in-depth reading material includes ‘Risk Arbitrage‘ by Wyser-Pratte, ‘Extreme Value Hedging‘ by Orol, and certain chapters of ‘Free Capital‘ by Guy Thomas.

How About Another Catalyst? (Part X)

Tags

Adrian Williams, Alphameric, alternative assets, Argo Group, asset managers, Avangardco, Bear Stearns, binary outcomes, capital expenditure, catalyst, delisting risk, DM plc, Dresden, emerging markets, Expected Value, Fair Value, Fortress Investment Group, Gagfah, government regulation, intrinsic value, IRR, Joe Lewis, litigation, major sale, Net LTV, P/E ratio, P/S Ratio, risk aversion, risk management, share buyback, share repurchase, takeover offers, Timeweave

Continued from here, & here’s the first post in the series.

vi) Litigation/Regulation is the final catalyst on my list. It’s also, without a doubt, the most difficult to exploit & to write about (note I’ve tackled this series in reverse order)! In fact, if it doesn’t (immediately) appeal to you, I might perhaps discourage you from ever bothering with this catalyst? To some extent it suffers from the same issues/perceptions I highlighted with v) the Major Sale catalyst.

First, most litigation/regulation risk/events are simply part & parcel of normal corporate operating activity. For example, certain sectors are almost permanently marked down due to their increased risk level (perhaps something politicians like to mouth off about?!). These risks usually aren’t of any fresh/major significance to a company’s business model or valuation, and/or they’re routinely priced in anyway – they are not catalysts.

But occasionally a real game changer comes along… A lawsuit, or a regulatory change/threat/action/approval, that could prompt a major change in a company’s future intrinsic value. It may also cause a rapid/significant adjustment in the company’s current market cap. So how exactly do we separate out & identify such a catalyst vs. the merely hum-drum? A similar approach, like v), seems sensible – something like: